CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with 20 cores 3.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2155
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
+6%
2303
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
28699
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
+26%
36296
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2991
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
+5%
3155
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
19830
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
+7%
21388
Cinebench 2024 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
131
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
+4%
137
Cinebench 2024 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
1519
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
+33%
2025
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
General Parameters
Dec 2024
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
265
Processor Number
265K
FCLGA-1851
Socket
FCLGA-1851
Arc Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Arc Xe-LPG
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)
Package
17.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
125 W
182 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
250 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
243 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
8
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
12
12
Efficiency Core Threads
12
1.8 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
20
Total Core Count
20
20
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24
Multiplier
39
-
L0 Cache
112 KB per core
192 K per core
L1 Cache
192 KB per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
3 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
30 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
256 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
1950 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
2000 MHz
-
Shader Units
512
-
Texture Units
32
-
Raster Operation Units
16
-
Execution Units
64
-
Power Consumption
14
-
Graphics Performance
2 TFLOPS
AI Accelerator
-
NPU
Intel AI Boost
-
Theoretical performance
13 TOPS
Miscellaneous
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Official Website
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
5.0
PCIe Version
5.0
24
PCIe Lanes
24
Related CPU Comparisons
1
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 9400F
2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 13400
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i3 10320
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 3 5425U
7
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 9700F
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 5 4500
10
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i3 9300
Related News
1
AMD Set to Evenly Compete with Intel in the Server CPU Market
2
AMD Launches New Instinct MI350 AI Accelerator
3
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
4
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
5
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
6
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
7
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
8
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
9
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
10
Intel Launches the All-New Core Ultra 200 Series Processors
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy