Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G with 8 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 5 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 3200)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 8MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 7nm)

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Jul 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Zen 2

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

AM4

Integrated Graphics

Radeon Vega 8

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Generation

-

Package

-

Transistor Count

4.9 billions

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

45-65 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

8

Performance Core Threads

16

1.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.4 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

8

20

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

15

Multiplier

36x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

512 K per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

256 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

43.71 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2100 MHz

-

Shader Units

512

-

Texture Units

32

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Execution Units

8

-

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

1.13 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

5

PCIe Version

3.0

PCIe Lanes

12

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 12400T

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Pentium Gold G5620

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 14701TE

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i3 10100

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Pentium Gold G6600

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Processor 300T

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Threadripper PRO 7955WX

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 10900K

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 12900K

Related News

1

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

2

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

3

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

4

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

5

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

6

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

7

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

8

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

9

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

10

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption