Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Celeron G3930

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Intel Celeron G3930

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Celeron G3930 with 2 cores 2.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 11 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2133)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 2MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron G3930 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (2.9GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Lower TDP (51W vs 65W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

VS

Intel Celeron G3930

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Jan 2017

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Kaby Lake

-

Processor Number

G3930

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1151

Integrated Graphics

HD Graphics 610

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

51 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

2

8

Performance Core Threads

2

1.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.9 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

2

20

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

15

Multiplier

29x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

256 K per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

2 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600

256 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

35.76 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

200 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1050 MHz

-

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

5 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 30 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.06 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Celeron G3930

5

PCIe Version

3.0

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 11600

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 6700K

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 9600K

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 13790F

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 10920X

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 8400

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 14790F

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i3 7100

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Related News

1

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

2

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

3

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

4

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

5

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

6

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

7

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

8

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

9

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

10

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes