Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Celeron G4900

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Intel Celeron G4900

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Celeron G4900 with 2 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 8 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 2MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron G4900 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Lower TDP (54W vs 65W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

VS

Intel Celeron G4900

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Apr 2018

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Coffee Lake

-

Processor Number

G4900

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1151

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 610

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

54 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

2

8

Performance Core Threads

2

1.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.1 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

2

20

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

15

Multiplier

31x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

256 K per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

2 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

256 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1050 MHz

-

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 30 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.2 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Celeron G4900

5

PCIe Version

3.0

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i3 10320

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i3 10100

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 14600K

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 11400F

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Celeron G5905

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Pentium Gold G5600T

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 9400F

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 8700T

Related News

1

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

2

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

3

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

4

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

5

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

6

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

7

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

8

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

9

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

10

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!