Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core 7 160HL

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core 7 160HL

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Core 7 160HL with 14 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5200)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 83.2GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core 7 160HL 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Dec 2024
Release Date
Apr 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)
Generation
Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS)

Package

3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
45 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
Intel

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
6
8
Performance Core Threads
12
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
8
12
Efficiency Core Threads
8
1.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1800 MHz
4.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
20
Total Core Count
14
20
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15
Multiplier
25.0
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
23 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
256 GB
Max Memory Size
96 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Miscellaneous

Official Website
5
PCIe Version
4
PCIe Lanes
8

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy