Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 8400T

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Intel Core i5 8400T

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Core i5 8400T with 6 cores 1.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 8 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2666)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 9MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Intel Core i5 8400T 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (1.7GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

VS

Intel Core i5 8400T

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Apr 2018

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Coffee Lake

-

Processor Number

i5-8400T

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1151

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 630

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

35 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

6

8

Performance Core Threads

6

1.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.7 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.3 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

6

20

Total Thread Count

6

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

15

Multiplier

17x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

256 K per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

9 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2666

256 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

41.6 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1050 MHz

-

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

24

-

Raster Operation Units

3

-

Execution Units

24

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i5 8400T

5

PCIe Version

3.0

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i3 12100F

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Pentium G4620

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 10700KF

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 11400

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 8500T

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Pentium 350

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Related News

1

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

2

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

3

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

4

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

5

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

6

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

7

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

8

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

9

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

10

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption