Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL with 16 cores 1.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5600)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 7nm)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
Score
General Parameters
Jan 2025
Release Date
Apr 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Meteor Lake-PS
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Arc Xe-LPG 128EU
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Ultra 7 (Meteor Lake-PS)
Package
17.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
45 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
105°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
243 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
6
16
Performance Core Threads
12
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
10
12
Efficiency Core Threads
10
1800 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
900 MHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
20
Total Core Count
16
20
Total Thread Count
22
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
14.0
192 KB per core
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5
Depends on motherboard-5600
256 GB
Max Memory Size
96 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
