Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
2893
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
+3%
2991
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
18519
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
+7%
19830
General Parameters
Jan 2025
Release Date
Dec 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
-
Processor Number
265
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
FCLGA-1851
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Arc Graphics
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Package
17.8 billions
Transistor Count
17.8 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
182 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
243 mm²
Die Size
243 mm²
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
8
16
Performance Core Threads
8
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
12
12
Efficiency Core Threads
12
1800 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
20
Total Core Count
20
20
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
24
192 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
3 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
30 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
256 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1950 MHz
