Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Celeron J4005

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Intel Celeron J4005

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with 20 cores 3.9GHz and Intel Celeron J4005 with 2 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 10 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 2.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron J4005 's Advantages

Lower TDP (10W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +774%

3156

Intel Celeron J4005

361

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +3329%

21364

Intel Celeron J4005

623

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

VS

Intel Celeron J4005

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

Dec 2017

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake

Core Architecture

Gemini Lake

265K

Processor Number

J4005

FCLGA-1851

Socket

BGA-1090

Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 600

Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

10 W

250 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

2

8

Performance Core Threads

2

3.9 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

5.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

3.3 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

2

20

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

39

Multiplier

-

112 K per core

L1 Cache

48 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

4 MB per core

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

192 GB

Max Memory Size

8 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

35.76 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

200 MHz

2000 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

700 MHz

512

Shader Units

96

16

Texture Units

12

8

Raster Operation Units

2

64

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

5 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

2.05 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.14 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Official Website

Intel Celeron J4005

5.0

PCIe Version

2.0

24

PCIe Lanes

6

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i7 8700K

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Pentium G4600

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i9 11900K

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Pentium G4620

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 7 1800X

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster