Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i9 13900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i9 13900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
VS
Intel Core i9 13900
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Intel Core i9 13900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with 20 cores 3.9GHz and Intel Core i9 13900 with 24 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5600)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core i9 13900 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 30MB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +5%
2304
Intel Core i9 13900
2190
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +1%
36335
Intel Core i9 13900
35774
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +4%
3156
Intel Core i9 13900
3006
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +12%
21364
Intel Core i9 13900
19064
Cinebench 2024 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +19%
144
Intel Core i9 13900
121
Cinebench 2024 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +32%
2156
Intel Core i9 13900
1622
Blender
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
486
Intel Core i9 13900 +1%
493
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
VS
Intel Core i9 13900

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
265K
Processor Number
i9-13900
FCLGA-1851
Socket
LGA-1700
Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)
Generation
-

Package

3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
65 W
250 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
219 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
TSMC
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
16
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
5.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
16
12
Efficiency Core Threads
16
3.3 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
20
Total Core Count
24
20
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
39
Multiplier
20x
112 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
192 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
2000 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
512
Shader Units
256
16
Texture Units
16
8
Raster Operation Units
8
64
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
2.05 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Official Website
Intel Core i9 13900
5.0
PCIe Version
5.0
24
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Processor 300
2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Pentium G4620
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i5 12600T
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Celeron G5920
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600
7
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i7 14700F
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Pentium Gold G6400
10
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i7 12700KF

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy