Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with 20 cores 3.9GHz and Intel Core Ultra 9 285K with 24 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 3.7GHz)

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 's Advantages

Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 30MB)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

2304

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

2318

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

36335

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +14%

41540

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

3156

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +7%

3377

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

21364

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +8%

23094

Cinebench 2024 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

144

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +4%

150

Cinebench 2024 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

2156

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +18%

2557

Blender

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

486

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +20%

587

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

Oct 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake

Core Architecture

Arrow Lake

265K

Processor Number

285K

FCLGA-1851

Socket

FCLGA-1851

Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)

Integrated Graphics

Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)

Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Generation

Ultra 9(Arrow Lake)

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

3 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

125 W

250 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

250 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

8

Performance Core Threads

8

3.9 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.7 GHz

5.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.5 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

16

12

Efficiency Core Threads

16

3.3 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

3.2 GHz

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4.6 GHz

20

Total Core Count

24

20

Total Thread Count

24

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

39

Multiplier

37

112 K per core

L1 Cache

112 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

3 MB per core

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

36 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR5-6400

192 GB

Max Memory Size

192 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

2000 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2000 MHz

512

Shader Units

512

16

Texture Units

16

8

Raster Operation Units

8

64

Execution Units

64

2.05 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

2.05 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Official Website

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

5.0

PCIe Version

5.0

24

PCIe Lanes

24

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i5 13490F

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i9 11900

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i7 10700K

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i7 12700T

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 3 3100

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Celeron G5900

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i3 9100F

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i5 14490F

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Intel Core i5 14600K

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

Related News

1

AMD RX 8800 XT's Ray Tracing Performance Surges by 45%, Rivals RTX 4080 with 25% Power Reduction!

2

Inspiration Technology Launches UM870 Slim Mini PC: Featuring Ryzen 7 8745H and USB4

3

Ryzen 9000X3D Boost Made Easier: No Need to Leave Windows Anymore!

4

Apple M5 Chip Set to Debut: The First to Harness TSMC's New Packaging Technology

5

Kioxia Plans Production Cuts in December: Hope for NAND Flash Prices to Stop Falling and Rebound

6

Advancements in AMD Zen6 Architecture: Significant Changes and Upgrades

7

The Laptop Market Revolution: 165Hz Surpasses 60Hz as the Mainstream Refresh Rate

8

AMD Set to Unveil RDNA 4 Architecture at CES 2025, At Least One Radeon RX 8000 Series Launch Expected in January

9

RTX 50 Desktop Edition Exclusively Uses Samsung GDDR7 Memory! The Other Two Giants Focus on Laptops

10

External GPU Performance Test: AMD RX 7800M Shows 28% Higher Efficiency with OCuLink Compared to USB4 Interface