Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with 20 cores 3.9GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 2600 with 6 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 1 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 3.4GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 16MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 12nm)

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 's Advantages

Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +127%

2308

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

1016

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +424%

37273

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

7101

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +174%

3208

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

1170

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +381%

21797

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

4526

Blender

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +256%

460

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

129

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

Sep 2018

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake

Core Architecture

Zen+

265KF

Processor Number

-

FCLGA-1851

Socket

AM4

No

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

-

Transistor Count

4.8 billions

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

12 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

65 W

250 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

6

8

Performance Core Threads

12

3.9 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.4 GHz

5.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.9 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

3.3 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

6

20

Total Thread Count

12

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

39

Multiplier

34x

112 K per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

16 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2933

192 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

43.71 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

24

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i3 9300T

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i3 13100F

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i5 13400F

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i9 11900

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i9 11900T

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i5 13400TE

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Pentium Gold G6400

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU