Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Apple M1 Ultra

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Apple M1 Ultra

Intel Core Ultra 9 285
VS
Apple M1 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Apple M1 Ultra
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz and Apple M1 Ultra with 20 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Apple M1 Ultra 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5600)
Larger memory bandwidth (800GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 7nm)
Lower TDP (60W vs 125W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 9 285
VS
Apple M1 Ultra

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Mar 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
Apple
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
ARMv8
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Apple M1
-
Processor Number
APL1106/APL1W06
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
Apple M-Socket
Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core)
Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
-

Package

-
Transistor Count
114 billions
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
60 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
16
16
Performance Core Threads
16
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
5.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
4
16
Efficiency Core Threads
4
1900 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
24
Total Core Count
20
24
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
25.0
Multiplier
-
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
48 MB shared
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600
Memory Types
LPDDR5-6400
256 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
16
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
800 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
600 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
450 MHz
1800 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1296 MHz
512
Shader Units
8192
-
Texture Units
512
-
Raster Operation Units
256
4
Execution Units
1024
-
Power Consumption
120 W
-
Max Resolution
6016x3384 - 60 Hz
1.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
21.2 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
-
16
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT
3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core 7 160HL
4
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 10100F
5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 6600
6
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 10300
7
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
8
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i9 12900T
9
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i9 12900KF
10
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i9 13900KF

Related News

1
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
2
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
3
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
4
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
5
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
6
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
7
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
8
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
9
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
10
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy