Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Core Ultra 9 285
VS
Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Intel Celeron J1900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 22nm)
Intel Celeron J1900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 125W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 9 285
VS
Intel Celeron J1900

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Nov 2013
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Bay Trail
-
Processor Number
J1900
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
FCBGA1170
Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
-

Package

7 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
10 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
Intel
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
4
16
Performance Core Threads
4
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
5.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.42 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
-
16
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1900 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
24
Total Core Count
4
24
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
25.0
Multiplier
20x
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR3L-1333
256 GB
Max Memory Size
8 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
21.3 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
600 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
688 MHz
1800 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
854 MHz
512
Shader Units
-
4
Execution Units
-
1.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.04 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
Intel Celeron J1900
5
PCIe Version
2.0
16
PCIe Lanes
4

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Pentium 1403 V2
3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 12500TE
4
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Pentium G4600
5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Celeron G4900
6
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 7700
7
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
8
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
9
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 13600
10
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Related News

1
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
2
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
3
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
4
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
5
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
6
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
7
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
8
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
9
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
10
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy