Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Celeron G4900

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Intel Celeron G4900

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K with 24 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Celeron G4900 with 2 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 6 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 3.1GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 2MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron G4900 's Advantages

Lower TDP (54W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +477%

3377

Intel Celeron G4900

585

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +2058%

23094

Intel Celeron G4900

1070

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +175%

5190

Intel Celeron G4900

1882

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +2611%

65816

Intel Celeron G4900

2427

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

VS

Intel Celeron G4900

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

Apr 2018

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake

Core Architecture

Coffee Lake

285K

Processor Number

G4900

FCLGA-1851

Socket

LGA-1151

Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 610

Ultra 9(Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

54 W

250 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

2

8

Performance Core Threads

2

3.7 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.1 GHz

5.5 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

16

Efficiency Cores

-

16

Efficiency Core Threads

-

3.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

24

Total Core Count

2

24

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

37

Multiplier

31x

112 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

36 MB shared

L3 Cache

2 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

192 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

2000 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1050 MHz

512

Shader Units

96

16

Texture Units

12

8

Raster Operation Units

2

64

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 30 Hz

2.05 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.2 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Official Website

Intel Celeron G4900

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

24

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 14401E

3

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Pentium Gold G5420T

4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 10900T

5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 13900K

6

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 8600K

7

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 13600

8

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 10900KF

9

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 9900

10

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU