Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 12400

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 12400

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
VS
Intel Core i5 12400
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core i5 12400
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K with 24 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Core i5 12400 with 6 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 18MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core i5 12400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +40%
2318
Intel Core i5 12400
1647
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +236%
41540
Intel Core i5 12400
12344
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +50%
3377
Intel Core i5 12400
2244
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +135%
23094
Intel Core i5 12400
9793
Cinebench 2024 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +47%
150
Intel Core i5 12400
102
Cinebench 2024 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +264%
2557
Intel Core i5 12400
701
Blender
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +212%
587
Intel Core i5 12400
188
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +47%
5190
Intel Core i5 12400
3528
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +238%
65816
Intel Core i5 12400
19439
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
VS
Intel Core i5 12400

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Alder Lake
285K
Processor Number
i5-12400
FCLGA-1851
Socket
LGA-1700
Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Ultra 9(Arrow Lake)
Generation
-

Package

3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
65 W
250 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
117 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
TSMC
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
6
8
Performance Core Threads
12
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
5.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
-
16
Efficiency Core Threads
-
3.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
24
Total Core Count
6
24
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
37
Multiplier
25x
112 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
1280 K per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
18 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
192 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
2000 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1450 MHz
512
Shader Units
192
16
Texture Units
48
8
Raster Operation Units
24
64
Execution Units
24
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Resolution
3840x2160 - 60 Hz
2.05 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.35 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Official Website
Intel Core i5 12400
5.0
PCIe Version
5.0
24
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 10400F
2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
4
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Celeron J4125
5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 12900E
6
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
7
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 10500
8
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 10900KF
9
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 11900K
10
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i3 13100E

Related News

1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy