Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 12900T

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 12900T

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
VS
Intel Core i9 12900T
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core i9 12900T
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K with 24 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Core i9 12900T with 16 cores 1.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 1.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 30MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core i9 12900T 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 5.0)
Lower TDP (35W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +24%
2318
Intel Core i9 12900T
1865
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +82%
41540
Intel Core i9 12900T
22804
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +42%
3377
Intel Core i9 12900T
2362
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +86%
23094
Intel Core i9 12900T
12384
Blender
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +283%
587
Intel Core i9 12900T
153
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
VS
Intel Core i9 12900T

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Alder Lake-S
285K
Processor Number
-
FCLGA-1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Ultra 9(Arrow Lake)
Generation
Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)

Package

3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
35 W
250 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
72 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
-
Die Size
215 mm²

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
16
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
5.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
8
16
Efficiency Core Threads
8
3.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1000 MHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
24
Total Core Count
16
24
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
37
Multiplier
14.0
112 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
30 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800
192 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
2000 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1550 MHz
512
Shader Units
-
16
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
64
Execution Units
32
2.05 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Official Website
Intel Core i9 12900T
5.0
PCIe Version
5
24
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE
2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL
3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
4
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 9980XE
5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 14900
6
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 6500
7
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 13400F
8
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 12500TE
9
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700
10
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 14900KS

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy