Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K with 24 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Core Ultra 5 240 with 10 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 3.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 24MB)
Intel Core Ultra 5 240 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 5.0)
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
285K
Processor Number
-
FCLGA-1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
Integrated Graphics
Ultra 9(Arrow Lake)
Generation
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Package
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
65 W
250 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
6
8
Performance Core Threads
6
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
5.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
4
16
Efficiency Core Threads
4
3.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
24
Total Core Count
10
24
Total Thread Count
10
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
37
Multiplier
32
112 K per core
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
23 MB
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
192 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
2000 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
512
Shader Units
-
32
Texture Units
-
16
Raster Operation Units
-
64
Execution Units
-
14
Power Consumption
-
2 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
