Intel Core Ultra 9 285T vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with 24 cores 1.4GHz and Intel Core Ultra 5 240 with 10 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 24MB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Intel Core Ultra 5 240 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 1.4GHz)
Score
General Parameters
Jan 2025
Release Date
Dec 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Package
17.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
65 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
243 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
6
16
Performance Core Threads
6
1.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
5.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
4
16
Efficiency Core Threads
4
1200 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
24
Total Core Count
10
24
Total Thread Count
10
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
14.0
Multiplier
32
192 KB per core
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
23 MB
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
256 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
600 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1800 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
512
Shader Units
-
4
Execution Units
-
1.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
20
PCIe Lanes
