Intel Pentium Gold 7505 vs Intel Core 3 100UL

VS

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 Intel Core 3 100UL

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Pentium Gold 7505 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core 3 100UL with 6 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 's Advantages

Released 119 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (LPDDR4x-3733 vs DDR5-5200)

Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.2GHz)

Intel Core 3 100UL 's Advantages

Better graphics card performance

Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (10MB vs 4MB)

Score

Intel Pentium Gold 7505

VS

Intel Core 3 100UL

General Parameters

Oct 2020

Release Date

Jan 1901

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Tiger Lake

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake-U

7505

Processor Number

100U

BGA-1449

Socket

Intel BGA 1744

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 64EU

-

Generation

Core 3 (Raptor Lake-U)

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

BGA-1449

Socket

Intel BGA 1744

15 W

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

55 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

-

Foundry

Intel

-

Package

FC-BGA16F

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

2

4

Performance Core Threads

4

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.2 GHz

3.5 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

4

-

Efficiency Core Threads

4

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

900 MHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

3.2 GHz

2

Total Core Count

6

4

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

20x

Multiplier

12.0

96 K per core

L1 Cache

80 KB per core

1256 K per core

L2 Cache

1.25 MB per core

4 MB shared

L3 Cache

10 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200

64 GB

Max Memory Size

96 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

-

Max Memory Bandwidth

83.2 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

1250 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1250 MHz

384

Shader Units

512

24

Texture Units

32

12

Raster Operation Units

16

48

Execution Units

64

15 W

Power Consumption

15 W

0.84 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

1.21 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Pentium Gold 7505

Official Website

Intel Core 3 100UL

3.0

PCIe Version

4

-

PCIe Lanes

8

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 1155G7 vs Intel Pentium Gold 7505

2

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 vs Intel Processor N200

3

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 vs Intel Processor N100

4

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H vs Intel Pentium Gold 7505

5

AMD Ryzen 5 7530U vs Intel Pentium Gold 7505

6

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

7

Intel Core 3 100UL vs Intel Core i5 1335U

8

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U vs Intel Core 3 100UL

9

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 vs Intel Core i7 10875H

10

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD