Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

VS

Intel Processor N200

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Processor N200 with 4 cores 1.8GHz and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H with 16 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Processor N200 's Advantages

Lower TDP (6W vs 65W)

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 11 months late

Higher specification of memory (7467 vs 4800)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 6MB)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Processor N200

924

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +106%

1908

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Processor N200

2988

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +581%

20374

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Processor N200

1262

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +111%

2665

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Processor N200

2701

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +467%

15326

Intel Processor N200

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

General Parameters

Jan 2023

Release Date

Dec 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Arrow Lake

N200

Processor Number

285H

BGA-1264

Socket

FCLGA-1851

UHD Graphics (32 EU)

Integrated Graphics

Arc Graphics

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

5 nm

6 W

Power Consumption

65 W

105°C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

6

-

Performance Core Threads

6

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.7 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.4 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

10

4

Efficiency Core Threads

10

1.8 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

0 GHz

3.7 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

4

Total Core Count

16

4

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

37x

Multiplier

37

96 K per core

L1 Cache

-

2 MB shared

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

6 MB shared

L3 Cache

24 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-4800

Memory Types

LPDDR5-7467,LPDDR5x-7467,DDR5-5600

16 GB

Max Memory Size

192 GB

1

Max Memory Channels

2

38.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

750 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

256

Shader Units

-

16

Texture Units

-

8

Raster Operation Units

-

32

Execution Units

-

45 W

Power Consumption

-

0.74 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Processor N200

Official Website

-

3.0

PCIe Version

5.0

9

PCIe Lanes

28

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i5 10310U

2

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Pentium Gold 7505

3

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

4

Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 5450U

5

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i7 1060NG7

6

Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640U

7

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i5 8265U

8

Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2300U

9

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

10

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i5 11320H

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market