Intel Xeon E 2324G vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E 2324G with 4 cores 3.1GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 with 4 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E 2324G 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2.1GHz)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Xeon E 2324G
+120%
1668
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
755
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E 2324G
+93%
5252
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
2709
General Parameters
Sep 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Rocket Lake-E
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 1200
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
UHD Graphics P750
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Rocket Lake-E)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
35 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
276 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
4
Total Core Count
4
4
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
31.0
Multiplier
21.0
80 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
2
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
4
PCIe Version
3
20
PCIe Lanes
32
