Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs EPYC Embedded 8434P

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs EPYC Embedded 8434P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 with 4 cores 3.7GHz and EPYC Embedded 8434P with 48 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 200W)
EPYC Embedded 8434P 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1866)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Sep 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ivy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

1.86 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
200 W
70 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
257 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
4
Total Core Count
48
8
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
37.0
Multiplier
25.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR3-1866
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy