Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 vs AMD EPYC 9384X

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 vs AMD EPYC 9384X

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 with 4 cores 3.5GHz and AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 3.1GHz)
Lower TDP (140W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2133)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (768MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3
1092
AMD EPYC 9384X +98%
2169
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3
3974
AMD EPYC 9384X +334%
17274
VS

General Parameters

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jun 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EP
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
Intel Socket 2011-3
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

2.6 billions
Transistor Count
90.16 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
140 W
Power Consumption
320 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
356 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
4
Total Core Count
32
8
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
25.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
768 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
40
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy