Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 vs EPYC Embedded 8434P

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 vs EPYC Embedded 8434P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 with 4 cores 3.5GHz and EPYC Embedded 8434P with 48 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Lower TDP (140W vs 200W)
EPYC Embedded 8434P 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2133)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Sep 2014
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EP
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 2011-3
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

2.6 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
140 W
Power Consumption
200 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
356 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
4
Total Core Count
48
8
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
25.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
40
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy