Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Higher specification of memory (DDR5-4800 vs DDR3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 10MB)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
690
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +187%
1984
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
2533
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +687%
19940
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

1.27 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
130 W
Power Consumption
360 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
294 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
FC-LGA10
Package
FC-LGA6096

CPU Performance

3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
96
8
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy