Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs Intel Xeon W 3335

Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs Intel Xeon W 3335

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and Intel Xeon W 3335 with 16 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.4GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Intel Xeon W 3335 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR3)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 32nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
690
Intel Xeon W 3335 +95%
1351
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
2533
Intel Xeon W 3335 +316%
10557
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2012
Release Date
Jul 2021
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Ice Lake-W
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)

Package

1.27 billions
Transistor Count
-
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
130 W
Power Consumption
250 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
78 °C
Intel
Foundry
Intel
294 mm²
Die Size
-
FC-LGA10
Package
FC-LGA4189

CPU Performance

3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
4
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
34.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
4
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
-
PCIe Lanes
64

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy