Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1650 vs AMD EPYC 7313

Intel Xeon E5 1650 vs AMD EPYC 7313

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1650 with 6 cores 3.2GHz and AMD EPYC 7313 with 16 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1650 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 3GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 155W)
AMD EPYC 7313 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 32nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1650
819
AMD EPYC 7313 +14%
938
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1650 +10%
5726
AMD EPYC 7313
5187
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2012
Release Date
Mar 2021
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Milan
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))

Package

2.27 billions
Transistor Count
16.6 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
155 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
435 mm²
Die Size
4x81 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
12 nm
-
I/O Die Size
416 mm²

CPU Performance

3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
6
Total Core Count
16
12
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.0
Multiplier
30.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
Cores per CCD
4
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
4
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy