Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3 vs AMD EPYC 9645
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3 with 6 cores 2GHz and AMD EPYC 9645 with 96 cores 2.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (52W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9645 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 1866)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.3GHz vs 2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 15MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Score
General Parameters
Sep 2014
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EP
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 2011-3
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Package
2.6 billions
Transistor Count
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
52 W
Power Consumption
320 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
356 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
96
-
Performance Core Threads
192
2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
6
Total Core Count
96
6
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20.0
Multiplier
23.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
15 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-1866
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
4
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
