Home Comparison Intel Xeon LC3518 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

Intel Xeon LC3518 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon LC3518 with 1 cores 1.733GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon LC3518 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.733GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 2MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 45nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Feb 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Jasper Forest
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 1366
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Jasper Forest)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
45 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
23 W
Power Consumption
360 W
95 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.733 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
1
Total Core Count
96
1
Total Thread Count
192
133 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
13.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
2 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

2
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy