Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101

Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 3120A with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 with 4 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Zen
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
35 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
350 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²

CPU Performance

1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
57
Total Core Count
4
228
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
21.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
-
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
32

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy