Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 3120P vs AMD EPYC 9015

Intel Xeon Phi 3120P vs AMD EPYC 9015

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 3120P with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9015 with 8 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9015 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (125W vs 300W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Turin
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
16.63 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
125 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
2x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
8
-
Performance Core Threads
16
1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
57
Total Core Count
8
228
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
36.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy