Intel Xeon Phi 31S1P vs AMD EPYC 8124PN
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 31S1P with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC 8124PN with 16 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 8124PN 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (100W vs 270W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2013
Release Date
Sep 2023
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Siena
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
17.75 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
270 W
Power Consumption
100 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
85 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
2x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
57
Total Core Count
16
228
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
20.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96
