Intel Xeon Phi 5120D vs AMD EPYC 9965
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 5120D with 60 cores 1.053GHz and AMD EPYC 9965 with 192 cores 2.25GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon Phi 5120D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 500W)
AMD EPYC 9965 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.25GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
SFF
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Turin
SFF 230-Pin
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
245 W
Power Consumption
500 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
192
-
Performance Core Threads
384
1.053 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.25 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
60
Total Core Count
192
240
Total Thread Count
384
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
22.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
