Intel Xeon Phi 5120D vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 5120D with 60 cores 1.053GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (1.5GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 245W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
SFF
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Zen
SFF 230-Pin
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
245 W
Power Consumption
30 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
350 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
1.053 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
60
Total Core Count
8
240
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
15.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
-
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
32
