Intel Xeon Phi 5120D vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9124
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 5120D with 60 cores 1.053GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 with 16 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (200W vs 245W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
SFF
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Genoa
SFF 230-Pin
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
26.28 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
245 W
Power Consumption
200 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
4x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.053 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
60
Total Core Count
16
240
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
30.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128
