Intel Xeon Phi 7250F vs AMD EPYC 9115
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7250F with 68 cores 1.4GHz and AMD EPYC 9115 with 16 cores 2.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9115 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (125W vs 230W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2016
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Package
8 billions
Transistor Count
16.63 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
230 W
Power Consumption
125 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
2x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
16
-
Performance Core Threads
32
1.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
68
Total Core Count
16
272
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
14.0
Multiplier
26.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
