Intel Xeon Phi 7250F vs AMD EPYC 9384X
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7250F with 68 cores 1.4GHz and AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon Phi 7250F 's Advantages
Lower TDP (230W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2016
Release Date
Jun 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
8 billions
Transistor Count
90.16 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
230 W
Power Consumption
320 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
68
Total Core Count
32
272
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
14.0
Multiplier
25.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
768 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128
