Intel Xeon Phi 7285 vs EPYC Embedded 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7285 with 68 cores 1.3GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 1.3GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (180W vs 250W)
Score
General Parameters
Dec 2017
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Mill
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Mill)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
8 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
250 W
Power Consumption
180 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
1.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
68
Total Core Count
32
272
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
13.0
Multiplier
26.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96
