Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 7290F vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U

Intel Xeon Phi 7290F vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7290F with 72 cores 1.5GHz and AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U with 6 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 1.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (28W vs 260W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2016
Release Date
Apr 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Hawk Point
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 760M
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))

Package

8 billions
Transistor Count
25 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
260 W
Power Consumption
28 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
178 mm²

CPU Performance

1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
1.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
72
Total Core Count
6
288
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
35.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-5600
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
4
-
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy