Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi SE10X vs AMD EPYC 9354

Intel Xeon Phi SE10X vs AMD EPYC 9354

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi SE10X with 61 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9354 with 32 cores 3.25GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9354 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.25GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (280W vs 300W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2022
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Genoa
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
52.56 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
280 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
61
Total Core Count
32
244
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
32.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy