Home Comparison Intel Xeon Platinum 8354H vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201

Intel Xeon Platinum 8354H vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Platinum 8354H with 18 cores 3.1GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Platinum 8354H 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2133)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (24.75MB vs 16MB)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 205W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon Platinum 8354H +99%
1573
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
789
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon Platinum 8354H +388%
10191
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
VS

General Parameters

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Cooper Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Platinum (Cooper Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
205 W
Power Consumption
30 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
-
Die Size
213 mm²

CPU Performance

3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
18
Total Core Count
8
36
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
31.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
24.75 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
8
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
6
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
3
48
PCIe Lanes
32

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy