Home Comparison Intel Xeon Platinum 8376H vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376H vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Platinum 8376H with 28 cores 2.6GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376H 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (205W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 38.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Cooper Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Platinum (Cooper Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
205 W
Power Consumption
360 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
28
Total Core Count
96
56
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
38.5 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
8
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
6
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
48
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy