Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 2102 vs AMD EPYC 9365

Intel Xeon W 2102 vs AMD EPYC 9365

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 2102 with 4 cores 2.9GHz and AMD EPYC 9365 with 36 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 2102 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 300W)
AMD EPYC 9365 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 2.9GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (192MB vs 8.25MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Aug 2017
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Skylake-W
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 2066
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Skylake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

-
Transistor Count
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
120 W
Power Consumption
300 W
66 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
484 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
36
-
Performance Core Threads
72
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
4
Total Core Count
36
4
Total Thread Count
72
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
29.0
Multiplier
34
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8.25 MB shared
L3 Cache
192 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
1
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
4
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
3
PCIe Version
5
48
PCIe Lanes
160

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy