Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3335 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9354

Intel Xeon W 3335 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9354

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3335 with 16 cores 3.4GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 with 32 cores 3.25GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3335 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 3.25GHz)
Lower TDP (250W vs 280W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (DDR5-4800 vs DDR4-3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 24MB)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3335
1351
AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 +43%
1934
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3335
10557
AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 +98%
20933
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
52.56 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
250 W
Power Consumption
280 W
78 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
FC-LGA4189
Package
FC-LGA6096

CPU Performance

3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
16
Total Core Count
32
32
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34.0
Multiplier
32.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy