Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3335 vs Intel Xeon E3 1280

Intel Xeon W 3335 vs Intel Xeon E3 1280

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3335 with 16 cores 3.4GHz and Intel Xeon E3 1280 with 4 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3335 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 32nm)
Intel Xeon E3 1280 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 3.4GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3335
1351
Intel Xeon E3 1280
1348
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3335 +132%
10557
Intel Xeon E3 1280
4533
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Apr 2011
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Sandy Bridge
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
Intel Socket 1155
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
Xeon E3 (Sandy Bridge)

Package

-
Transistor Count
1.16 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
250 W
Power Consumption
95 W
78 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
Intel
-
Die Size
216 mm²

CPU Performance

3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
16
Total Core Count
4
32
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34.0
Multiplier
35.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3
8
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
3
64
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy