Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201

Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3365 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR4-2133)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (48MB vs 16MB)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 270W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3365 +141%
1902
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
789
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3365 +779%
18361
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
270 W
Power Consumption
30 W
81 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
-
Die Size
213 mm²
FC-LGA4189
Package
SP4r2

CPU Performance

2.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
32
Total Core Count
8
64
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
27.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
48 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
8
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
3
64
PCIe Lanes
32

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy