Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3451

Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3451

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 with 16 cores 2.15GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3365 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.15GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (48MB vs 32MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 270W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3365 +58%
973
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451
613
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3365 +155%
21500
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451
8408
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
270 W
Power Consumption
100 W
81 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
-
Die Size
2x213 mm²

CPU Performance

2.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.15 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
32
Total Core Count
16
64
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
27.0
Multiplier
21.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
48 MB shared
L3 Cache
32 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
8
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
3
64
PCIe Lanes
64

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy