Home Comparison Intel Xeon X5687 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201

Intel Xeon X5687 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon X5687 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon X5687 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.5GHz)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (3 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon X5687
572
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 +37%
789
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon X5687 +1%
2117
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
VS

General Parameters

Feb 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Westmere-EP
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 1366
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Westmere-EP)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

1.17 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
30 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
239 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²

CPU Performance

3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
3.866 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
8
133 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
27.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
3
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

2
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
32

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy