Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1650MHz vs 1125MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+9%
2534
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2304
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Apr 2020
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
30W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.7 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
